🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.